Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 29;17:176. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1243-5

Table 3.

Results from multivariable logistic regression analysis of the association of CDI and ODI with EQ-5D-5 L dimensions, adjusted for age, sex, marital status and BMI

Deprivation index Mobility Self-Care Usual Activities Pain/Discomfort Anxiety/Depression
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
CDI (1 Most well off) – reference
 2 1.61 (1.34, 1.95) 1.80 (1.25, 2.60) 1.40 (1.18, 1.66) 1.37 (1.19, 1.16) 1.01 (0.88, 1.17)
 3 2.31 (1.86, 2.88) 2.62 (1.75, 3.9) 1.87 (1.53, 2.29) 1.77 (1.49, 2.10) 1.33 (1.12, 1.58)
 4 4.30 (3.20, 5.80) 6.2 (3.92, 9.81) 2.93 (2.21, 3.89) 2.63 (2.01, 3.45) 2.14 (1.67, 2.74)
 5 (Least well off) 6.90 (4.53, 10.52) 6.88 (3.77, 12.57) 5.90 (3.95, 8.81) 3.92 (2.53, 6.08) 3.32 (2.25, 4.90)
ODI (Score 0–1) - reference
 Score 2–10 4.17 (3.10, 5.62) 4.47 (3.10, 6.44) 5.21 (3.90, 6.97) 4.35 (2.97, 6.38) 3.61 (2.69, 4.83)

CDI Canadian Deprivation Index

ODI Ontario Deprivation Index

BMI Body Mass Index

All associations were statistically significant at p value < 0.05