Table 1.
Cluster rating averages and ranks for Fostering International Collaboration in Implementation Science (FICIS)
| Thematic cluster | Importance for FICIS | Feasibility for FICIS | Combined rank | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster number | Cluster rating | Cluster rank | Cluster rating | Cluster rank | Rank score | |
| Strategic planning | 1 | 3.94 | 1 | 4.24 | 1 | 2 |
| Practicality | 2 | 3.90 | 3 | 3.68 | 4 | 7 |
| Networking and shared identity | 10 | 3.40 | 6 | 4.03 | 2 | 8 |
| Funding | 5 | 3.93 | 2 | 3.17 | 8 | 10 |
| Innovative and adaptive research | 8 | 3.48 | 5 | 3.30 | 7 | 12 |
| Facilitate meetings | 11 | 3.36 | 7 | 3.62 | 5 | 12 |
| Define common principles | 3 | 3.10 | 10 | 3.80 | 3 | 13 |
| Training is researchers | 9 | 3.53 | 4 | 3.14 | 10 | 14 |
| Technological tools for collaboration | 4 | 3.15 | 9 | 3.35 | 6 | 15 |
| Disseminate importance of FICIS | 6 | 3.23 | 8 | 2.77 | 11 | 19 |
| Knowledge sharing | 7 | 3.03 | 11 | 3.17 | 9 | 20 |
FICIS Fostering International Collaboration in Implementation Science. Cluster ratings ranged from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more importance or greater feasibility for FICIS