Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 22;10:2200. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02200

Table 2.

Meta-analysis of NGS data and Sanger sequencing data of BP patients and controls.

mtSNP Gene/region Sequencing method Group Sequenced (n) Variant carrier (n) Frequency (%) Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value* Q (p adjust, Hommel)
m.16263 T>C D-loop NGS BP 180 1 0.56 0.1116 (0.0051–0.7471) 0.0201
Control 188 9 4.79
Sanger BP 82 0 0.00 0 (0–1.2049) 0.1222
Control 90 4 4.44
Meta-analysis BP 262 1 0.38 0.1833 (0.0635–0.5293) 0.0017 0.0085
Control 278 13 4.68
m.11914G>A MT-ND4 NGS BP 180 6 3.33 6.4216 (0.8682–146.8755) 0.0626
Control 188 1 0.53
Sanger BP 89 4 4.49 4.7190 (0.6014-−116.3248) 0.1860
Control 102 1 0.98
Meta-analysis BP 269 10 3.72 4.2418 (1.3521–13.3077) 0.0132 0.0264
Control 290 2 0.69
m.15904C>T MT-TT NGS BP 180 9 5.00 3.2360 (0.876–14.143) 0.0813
Control 188 3 1.60
Sanger BP 88 4 4.55 0.7867 (0.2019–3.0665) 0.7574
Control 104 6 5.77
Meta-analysis BP 268 13 4.85 1.6283 (0.6935–3.8232) 0.2629 0.2629
Control 292 9 3.08
m.16051A>G D-loop NGS BP 180 2 1.11 0.6936 (0.0852–4.5071) 1
Control 188 3 1.60
Sanger BP 88 0 0.00 0 (0–0.5505) 0.0041
Control 104 9 8.65
Meta-analysis BP 268 2 0.75 0.2583 (0.0889–0.7505) 0.0129 0.0258
Control 292 12 4.11
m.16162 A>G D-loop NGS BP 180 2 1.11 0.4121 (0.0574–2.0169) 0.4494
Control 188 5 2.66
Sanger BP 88 0 0.00 0 (0–0.6679) 0.0081
Control 104 8 7.69
Meta-analysis BP 268 2 0.75 0.2464 (0.0881–0.6889) 0.0076 0.0198
Control 292 13 4.45

For the Sanger sequencing, 106 controls (for the genotyping of m.15904C>T, m.16051A>G, m.16162A>G, and m.16263T>C) or 104 controls (for the genotyping of m.11914G>A) and 90 BP samples were tested. The number of samples with no genotyping data due to the low quality-sequence was subtracted from the tested sample number.