Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 22;19(5):914–923. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001986

Table 2.

Characteristics of respondents in the California Women’s Health Survey (1999–2001, 2003–2005) by reported intimate partner violence (IPV)

Characteristic No reported IPV (%) Any reported IPV (%) Minor IPV (%) Severe IPV (%)
Total % 96·3 3·7 3·0 0·8
Food secure 79·8 52·0 53·5 46·9
Low food security 13·5 22·7 23·1 21·5
Very low food security 6·7 25·3 23·4 31·5
P<0·0001
Age (years)
Mean 44·54 34·70 35·17 32·91
se 14·47 10·75 10·84 10·24
P<0·0001
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White 53·9 40·8 42·6 34·6
African-American 3·4 5·5 5·1 6·7
Hispanic 28·0 39·7 38·6 43·4
Other 14·7 14·0 13·6 15·2
P<0·0001
Educational attainment
High school or less 37·7 49·2 46·0 60·3
More than high school 62·3 50·8 54·0 39·7
P<0·0001
Income as indexed by the FPL
Below 200 % 26·2 46·4 44·1 45·8
Above 200 % 73·8 53·6 55·9 54·2
P<0·0001
Children present in home
No 44·9 25·6 25·9 24·8
Yes 55·1 74·4 74·1 75·2
P<0·0001
Employment
Out of workforce 46·5 42·4 41·8 44·7
In workforce 53·5 57·6 58·2 55·3
P=0·0861
Marital status
Married 91·3 72·8 75·1 64·9
Unmarried couple 8·7 27·2 24·9 35·1
P<0·0001

FPL, federal poverty level.

Weighted estimates are shown. Differences for categorical variables estimated from Rao–Scott χ 2 test. Differences for continuous variable estimated from t-test statistic.