Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: School Ment Health. 2019 Jan 23;11(3):438–453. doi: 10.1007/s12310-019-09311-7

Table 2.

Information Used to Evaluate Tested LPA Dual-Factor Mental Health Models

Model Number of
classes		 Log
likelihood		 BIC p-value of
BLRT		 p-value of
LMRT		 BF cmP Entropy Class Prevalence
Grade 9 - Model 1 (n = 332) 1 −1464.48 2998.61 - - <.001 <.001 - 1.00
2 −1299.40 2709.10 <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001 0.74 .44, .55
3 −1231.61 2614.15 <.001 0.01 <.001 <.001 0.85 .05, .35, .60
4 −1197.99 2587.56 <.001 0.55 3.18 0.75 0.78 .06, .31, .20, .43
5 −1178.83 2589.87 <.001 0.10 23.80 0.24 0.81 .01, .09, .19, .27, .44
6 −1161.69 2596.21 <.001 0.31 <.001 0.01 0.81 .01, .08, .12, .12, .28, .39
Grade 9 - Model 2 (n = 332)
1
−1464.48
2998.61
-
-
<.001
<.001
-
1.00
2 −1264.67 2674.46 <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001 0.82 .33, .67
3 −1195.92 2612.43 <.001 0.03 0.23 0.10 0.75 .23, .33, .44
4* −1156.72 2609.50 <.001 0.20 0.98 0.45 0.79 .05, .25, .32, .39
5* −1118.97 2609.47 <.001 0.26 >100 0.45 0.82 .05, .09, .23, .23, .41
6* −1095.71 2638.41 0.01 0.62 <.001 <.001 0.81 .05, .07, .11, .18, .27, .32
Grade 10 - Model 1 (n = 324)
1
−1283.37
2636.10
-
-
<.001
<.001
-
1.00
2 −1101.50 2312.83 <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001 0.75 .49, .51
3 −1040.96 2232.21 <.001 0.02 0.09 0.08 0.82 .07, .41, .53
4 −1018.37 2227.50 <.001 0.39 11.42 0.85 0.78 .06, .21, .32, .41
5 −1000.57 2232.37 <.001 0.38 799.91 0.07 0.76 .07, .09, .17, .32, .35
6 −987.02 2245.74 0.01 0.54 <.001 <.001 0.78 .02, .07, .09, .16, .32, .34
Grade 10 - Model 2 (n = 324)
1
−1283.37
2636.10
-
-
<.001
<.001
-
1.00
2 −1058.99 2262.49 <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001 0.80 .42, .58
3* −990.87 2201.41 <.001 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.79 .15, .35, .51
4* −948.16 2191.13 <.001 <0.001 >100 0.99 0.80 .09, .13, .38, .40
5* −919.23 2208.43 <.001 0.11 40.49 <.001 0.84 .10, .12, .13, .29, .36
6* −885.36 2215.83 <.001 0.03 <.001 <.001 0.84 .05, .09, .12, .13, .24, .37
Grade 11 - Model 1 (n = 291)
1
−1379.66
2827.40
-
-
<.001
<.001
-
1.00
2 −1161.17 2430.13 <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001 0.83 .38, .62
3 −1104.56 2356.62 <.001 0.21 <.001 <.001 0.86 .05, .43, .52
4 −1059.07 2305.36 <.001 0.01 0.03 <.001 0.82 .04, .21, .31, .44
5 −1035.57 2298.07 <.001 0.39 0.17 0.14 0.81 .03, .10, .20, .22, .44
6 −1013.92 2294.49 <.001 0.67 <.001 0.85 0.82 .03, .09, .12, .18, .22, .36
Grade 11 - Model 2 (n = 291)
1
−1379.66
2827.40
-
-
<.001
<.001
-
1.00
2* −1127.24 2396.32 <.001 <0.001 <.001 <.001 0.80 .44, .56
3* −1033.93 2283.45 <.001 0.20 <.001 <.001 0.86 .19, .33, .48
4* −979.96 2249.26 <.001 0.37 - 1.00 0.87 .06, .16, .30, .48

Note. Bolded values = preferred model for a given fit index and shaded rows = model selected for each year.

*

log likelihood starting values did not converge, indicating model instability.