Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 30;2019(11):CD011968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011968.pub3

Comparison 2. rPMS plus rehabilitation versus sham plus rehabilitation.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Activities of daily living at the end of treatment 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2 Activities of daily living at the end of follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3 Upper limb function at the end of treatment 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4 Upper limb function at the end of follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5 Spasticity of the elbow at the end of treatment 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
6 Spasticity of the elbow at the end of follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
7 Spasticity of the wrist at the end of treatment 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
8 Spasticity of the wrist at the end of follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only