Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 29;9:17976. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54586-0

Table 3.

Path analysis showing direct and indirect effect of Y1–Y5 to Z (Pascopyrum smithii Schreb.).

year Indirect effect via
 → Y1 → Z  → Y2 → Z  → Y3 → Z  → Y4 → Z  → Y5 → Z
Y1 2003 0.480*** 0.0383 −0.1348 0.1740 −0.0239
2004 0.423*** 0.0077 0.0010 −0.0005 0.0213
2005 0.777*** 0.0257 −0.0517 −0.0391 −0.0554
Y2 2003 0.088 −0.0799 0.1039 −0.0188
2004 0.061*** 0.0003 −0.0002 0.0064
2005 0.046 −0.0367 −0.0294 −0.0367
Y3 2003 0.454** −0.2920 0.0062
2004 −0.006 0.0004 −0.0083
2005 0.081 0.0582 0.0447
Y4 2003 −0.371* 0.0129
2004 0.005 −0.0034
2005 0.100 0.0280
Y5 2003 0.055
2004 −0.065**
2005 0.087
Total direct effect 1.68 0.195 0.529 −0.266 0.077
Total effect 1.68 0.2667 0.2272 −0.2907 0.05

*Significant at the 0.05 probability level.

**Significant at the 0.01 probability level.

The direct effects of Y1–Y5 to Z are highlighted in bold (on the main diagonal cells); Arrows indicate the direction of the effect.