Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cult Health Sex. 2019 May 30;22(4):398–412. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1604994

Table 3:

Multivariate linear regression for the association between race, socio-economic status, and enacted, anticipated and internalised stigma (N=396)

Variables Enacted stigma (n=210) Anticipated stigma (n=207) Internalised stigma (n=210)
Model 1a Model 1b Model 2a Model 2b Model 3a Model 3b
B (SE) B (SE) B (SE) B (SE) B (SE) B (SE)
Racea
 African American 0.10 (0.07) 0.01 (0.08) 0.44 (0.08)*** 0.45 (0.10)*** 0.10 (0.10) 0.14 (0.07)*
 Latino 0.03 (0.07) −0.07 (0.08) 0.27 (0.08)*** 0.26 (0.10)** 0.13 (0.10)* 0.16 (0.07)*
SES 0.02 (0.03) −0.19 (0.08)** −0.03 (0.04) −0.04 (0.08) −0.06 (0.02)* 0.03 (0.06)
SES*African American 0.29 (0.08)*** 0.05 (0.10) −0.09 (0.07)
SES*Latino 0.22 (0.08)** −0.02 (0.10) −0.12 (0.08)
R-Squared 0.26 0.29 0.37 0.38 0.07 0.073
Adjusted R-Squared 0.24 0.26 0.36 0.36 0.05 0.05
F-value F 10, 367=13.02 F 12, 365=12.13 F 10 363=21.71 F 12, 361=18.10 F 10, 367=2.79 F 11,365 =2.52

Note. Model a: without interaction. Model b: with interaction. All models were adjusted for age, gender, immigration status, parental status, nicotine dependence, and general stressful life events over the past 12 months.

a

Reference category = White

***

p<0.001,

**

p<0.01,

*

p<0.05