. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Aug 6;20(12):1605–1610. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.06.019

Table 3.

Prediction ability of frailty indicators on recurrent falls

	Men			Women
	OR (95%CI)	AUC	p-value^§	OR (95%CI)	AUC	p-value^§
CHS^†	1.29 (0.98, 1.70)	0.634		1.15 (0.94, 1.41)	0.565
FRAIL^†	1.59 (1.08,2.32)^*	0.641		1.62 (1.25,2.09)^*	0.607
SOF^†	1.80 (0.99, 3.26)	0.634		1.77 (1.20,2.63)^*	0.586
Fall History^†
None	Reference	0.681		Reference	0.645
1	2.21 (1.15,4.25)^*			2.32 (1.42,3.79)
2 or more	7.27 (3.63, 14.55)^*			4.35 (2.52, 7.50)
CHS^‡	1.20 (0.91, 1.58)	0.693	0.297	1.10 (0.89, 1.35)	0.656	0.440
FRAIL^‡	1.35 (0.91, 2.00)	0.683	0.816	1.48 (1.14, 1.93)^*	0.676	0.064
SOF^‡	1.57 (0.86, 2.88)	0.678	0.806	1.57 (1.06,2.35)^*	0.673	0.078

P-value < 0.05

^†

Adjusted for age

^‡

Adjusted for age and history of falls

^§

P-value indicating the difference in AUC between the model including the frailty indicator on top of fall history and age, and the model including only fall history and age.