Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 11.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2019 Nov 11;22(12):2000–2012. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0528-7

Extended Data Fig. 3. Conditioning context or CS exposure does not affect BLA-CeL circuit input bias onto CRF+ and CRF− neurons.

Extended Data Fig. 3.

a, Traces of maximal oEPSC amplitude from CRF+ (red) and CRF− (black) neuronal pairs across behavioral conditions for stimulation of the BLA-CeL circuit (scale bars 10ms, 100pA). b, XY graphs depicting skew-plot of maximal oEPSC amplitude from each CRF+ and CRF− neuronal pair for behavioral conditions (n=15 basal pairs, 4 mice, n=17 basal context pairs, 4 mice, and n=15 basal CS+ pairs, 5 mice; extra sum-of-squares F test, F(1,14)=30.55, P<0.0001 for basal, F(1,16)=35.56, P<0.0001 for basal context, and F(1,14)=113.2, P<0.0001 for basal CS+). c, Representation of CRF+ and CRF− maximal oEPSC amplitude ratio (log scale; n=14 basal pairs, n=17 basal context, and n=14 basal CS+ pairs; Kruskal-Wallis test, ns=non-significant, P=0.5860). XY skew-plots are presented as absolute value. Bar graphs are presented as mean + S.E.M. ****P<0.0001.