Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 29;19:1161. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6373-y

Table 1.

Main characteristics of all studies included in the meta-analysis

Study Country Case number High expression (%) Pathological type NAC (%) Location Tumor stage Follow-up (months) Cut-off value Multivariate analysis HRs provided from Outcome NOS score
Ishibashi 2018 [12] Japan 143 75 (51.7) Multiple 72 (50.3) 22/56/65 33/33/60/17 NR 0.085 Yes/No Report/SC OS/CSS 7
Kunizaki 2018 [13] Japan 116 51 (44) Squamous NR 15/31/19 0-II36/III-IV29 Median 35.9 0.042 Yes/No Report/SC OS/CSS 7
Otowa 2017 [14] Japan 149 114 (76.5) Squamous 149 (100) 24/73/52 IIA24/IIB36/III89 NR 0.03 Yes Report OS 6
Shao 2015 [24] China 633 140 (22.1) Squamous 0 (0) 33/428/172 I106/IIa203/IIb92/III232 Median 39 0.012 Yes Report OS 7
Matsunaga 2019 [25] Japan 163 69 (42.3) Multiple 95 (58.3) 32/86/45 012/I48/II45/III54/IV4 NR 0.0375 No SC OS 7
Wei 2015 [22] China 423 147 (34.8) Squamous NR 36/252/135 41/131/81/23 Median 35.7 0.055 Yes Report OS 8
Xu 2015 [23] China 468 87 (18.6) Squamous 0 (0) 155/64/249 I24/II181/IIIA121/IIIB+IIIC142 Median 49.9 0.5 Yes Report OS 9
Yu 2018 [26] China 160 85 (53.1) Squamous 0 (0) 26/104/30 I160 Median 71.8 0.023 Yes Report OS 5

NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, NR not report, HR hazard ratio, SC survival curve, OS overall survival, CSS cancer-specific survival, NOS Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale