Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 29;19:1161. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6373-y

Table 2.

Pooled hazard ratios for OS and CSS according to subgroup analyses

Outcome subgroup Study number Case number HR (95%CI)-model P value Heterogeneity
I2 (%) P
OS 8 2255 1.81 (1.40–2.35)-random < 0.001 55.5 0.028
 Country
  Japan 4 571 1.98 (1.41–2.77)-fixed < 0.001 0 0.469
  China 4 1684 1.76 (1.19–2.59)-random 0.005 75.9 0.006
 Pathological type
  Squamous 6 1949 1.73 (1.26–2.38)-random 0.001 65.0 0.014
  Multiple 2 306 2.18 (1.40–3.40)-fixed 0.001 0 0.597
 Proportion of NAC
  100% 1 149 1.15 (0.56–2.69) 0.715
  None 3 1261 2.02 (1.13–3.62)-random < 0.001 80.7 0.006
  Others 4 845 1.79 (1.32–2.41)-random < 0.001 25.5 0.259
 Cut-off value
  < 0.04 4 1105 1.68 (1.03–2.73)-random 0.037 46.6 0.132
  ≥ 0.04 4 1150 1.94 (1.41–2.69)-random < 0.001 59.0 0.063
CSS 2 259 2.61 (1.67–4.06)-fixed < 0.001 0 0.748

OS overall survival, CSS cancer-specific survival, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval