Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 27;7:e8140. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8140

Table 4. Associations between changes in SARC-F sum score or individual item responses and change in objective measures of muscle function across intervention.

Isometric strength Handgrip Strength Walking speed Chair-stand test
SARC-F Total Score (r) 0.01 (−0.14 to 0.16) −0.03 (−0.18 to −0.12) −0.30 (−0.43 to −0.15) 0.33 (0.18–0.45)
SARC-F Slowness (RR) 0.76 (0.46–1.3) 0.95 (0.57–1.6) 0.63 (0.37–1.1) 2.2 (1.2–4.1)
SARC-F Walking (RR) 1.19 (0.91–3.9) 1.12 (0.57–2.5) 0.36 (0.15–0.86)* 2.0 (1.0–3.4)*
SARC-F Chair (RR) 1.32 (0.76–2.3) 0.82 (0.46–1.5) 0.47 (0.24–0.92)* 2.1 (1.2–3.8)
SARC-F Stairs (RR) 0.83 (0.48–1.4) 0.57 (0.32–1.0) 0.40 (0.21–0.76) 2.0 (1.1–3.5)*
SARC-F Falls (RR) 0.92 (0.51–1.7) 1.13 (0.73–2.4) 0.94 (0.52–1.7) 1.11 (0.60–2.0)

Notes.

AR2
Adjusted R2
RR
Relative risk ratio moving from positive to negative change in SARC-F item response for a one standard deviation increase in objective measure change
*

p < 0.05.

p < 0.01.

p < 0.001.