Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 5;2015(3):CD009924. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009924.pub2

Waber 1981.

Methods Study date: 1981. RCT. Different arms. A = control, A1 = maternal education only, B = fed from 6 months, B1 = fed + maternal education from 6 months, D = mothers fed from third trimester
Participants SES or context: Low‐ and middle‐income country: Southern slums in Bogata, Colombia
Nutritional status: Half of children in family below 85% percentile for weight
Age: 6 months ‐ 3 years
Sex: Approximately equal in both groups
Number: 433
Interventions Intervention: Feeding: Enriched bread, dry skimmed milk, and cooking oil for entire family. Index child given dry skimmed milk, high protein vegetable mixture, and ferrous sulcate. Supplements delivered in store‐like atmosphere once a week
Maternal education. Trained home visitors worked directly with the children and trained mothers to become more responsive
Energy: 623 kcal per day. 30 g protein
Duration: 32 months
% DRI for energy: Not enough information
% DRI for protein: Not enough information
Control: Home‐feeding as usual, or education
Provider: Not clear
Supervised: Not clear. However, home visitors worked with children and educated mothers
Compliance: Not mentioned
Outcomes Psychological: Griffiths Mental Development Scales and Einsten IQ test
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Simply noted that study was randomised
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No detail
Baseline outcome measurements Unclear risk No significance given
Baseline characteristics Unclear risk Not applicable
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 433 started trial; 318 reported. Does not say who or why
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Training mentioned, blinding not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding not possible for participants
Protection from contamination Unclear risk Not applicable
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No access to protocol