Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 8;2014(12):CD010590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub2
Methods
  • Study design: RCT

  • Study duration: NS

Participants
  • Setting: 50 centres

  • Countries: 10 (Bosnia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Israel, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Turkey)

  • Stage of CKD: eGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m²

  • Mean age ± SD (years): epoetin beta (61.7 ± 15.7), biosimilar epoetin theta (64.1 ± 13.1)

  • Sex (M/F): epoetin beta (59/36), female (92/101)

  • Other characteristics: Hb 9.5 to 12.0 g/dL; adequate iron stores

  • Exclusion criteria: conditions known to cause anaemia; but not related to CKD (e.g. active bleeding); RBC transfusion within the last 3 months; female patients of childbearing potential; uncontrolled severe hypertension; congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV); severe metabolic acidosis; current systemic infection or inflammatory disease; current malignant disease; resistance to epoetin (more than 300 IU/kg body weight/wk); known hypersensitivity to epoetin or excipients of the formulation; known presence of antibodies to epoetin

Interventions Treatment group
  • Epoetin beta

    • SC aiming for Hb level 9.5 to 12.0 g/dL for 6 months


Control group
  • Biosimilar epoetin theta

    • SC aiming for Hb level 9.5 to 12.0 g/dL for 6 months


Iron supplementation
  • As required

Outcomes Primary study outcome
  • Hb level change from baseline to end of treatment


Outcomes for meta‐analysis
  • All‐cause mortality

  • Cardiovascular events

  • Hypertension

Notes
  • Funding: BioGeneriX AG

  • Trials registration: EudraCT No. 2005‐000142‐37

  • Contact with study authors: contacted (no reply or data received)

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Interactive voice‐response system
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Low risk Drug administered by third party who was aware of treatment assignment
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk 20/95 lost to follow‐up in epoetin beta arm (21%) and 34/193 lost to follow‐up in biosimilar epoetin theta arm (18%). As this was > 10%, this was judged to be high risk
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Data for major cardiovascular events available
Other bias Low risk Sponsor on authorship and involved in statistical analysis