Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 8;2014(12):CD010590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub2
Methods
  • Study design: RCT

  • Study duration: NS

Participants
  • Setting: 26 centres

  • Country: Malaysia

  • Stage of CKD: HD

  • Mean age ± SD (years): epoetin alfa (49 ± 13), biosimilar epoetin alfa (49 ± 12)

  • Sex (M/F): epoetin alfa (61/32), biosimilar epoetin alfa (45/48)

  • Other characteristics: Hb ≥ 9 g/dL; adequate iron stores

  • Exclusion criteria: pregnant or nursing woman; poorly controlled hypertension (DBP > 110 mm Hg); history of seizure disorder; active infection or inflammation; any illness that had required hospitalisation within previous month; recent blood transfusion; haematologic abnormalities (haemolysis, microcytosis, thrombocytosis); severe hyperparathyroidism; malignancy; history of mental illness; drug or alcohol abuse and known hypersensitivity to mammalian cell‐derived product or human albumin

Interventions Treatment group
  • Epoetin alfa

    • IV aiming for Hb level > 8 g/dL


Control group
  • Biosimilar epoetin alfa

    • IV aiming for Hb level > 8 g/dL


Iron supplementation
  • IV or oral as required

Outcomes Primary trial outcome
  • Change in Hb from baseline to week 12


Outcomes extracted for meta‐analysis
  • All‐cause mortality

  • Major cardiovascular events

  • Transfusions

  • Fatigue

  • Breathlessness

Notes
  • Funding: NCPC GeneTech Biotechnology Company

  • Trials registration: NCT00229099

  • Contact with study authors: not contacted

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Randomised centrally
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk Not double‐dummy controlled
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Discrepancy in proportion of patients lost in biosimilar ESA arm
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All patient‐relevant outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk None apparent