Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD003372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003372.pub3

Comparison 3. Overall response.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 Overall response ‐ assessable patients‐all trials 46 9044 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.29 [1.14, 1.45]
3.1.1 Question 1: Regimen A versus Regimen A + Other 29 6102 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.37 [1.20, 1.56]
3.1.2 Question 2: Regimen A versus Regimen C (poly) 17 2942 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.13 [0.87, 1.47]
3.2 Overall response ‐ assessable patients first line 25 4767 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.35 [1.16, 1.56]
3.2.1 Question 1: Regimen A versus Regimen A + other 17 3055 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.38 [1.14, 1.66]
3.2.2 Question 2: Regimen A versus Regimen C (poly) 8 1712 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.31 [1.01, 1.69]
3.3 Overall response ‐ Question 1 ‐ Regimen A versus A + other ‐ assessable patients 27 5125 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.32 [1.16, 1.50]
3.3.1 Sub group A: Single anthracycline agent versus anthracycline + other regimen 16 3084 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.15 [1.02, 1.31]
3.3.2 Sub group B: Single alkylating agent versus alkylanting agent + other 5 390 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.60 [0.96, 2.67]
3.3.3 Sub group C: Single antimetabolite versus antimetabolite + other 3 275 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.95 [1.92, 4.52]
3.3.4 Sub group D: Single taxane versus taxane + other 3 1376 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.52 [1.26, 1.83]
3.4 Overall response ‐ Question 2 ‐ Regimen A versus Regimen C ‐ assessable patients 16 2713 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.84, 1.48]
3.4.1 Sub group E ‐ Single anthrycycline agent versus non‐anthrycycline combination regimen 4 714 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.42 [1.15, 1.76]
3.4.2 Sub group F ‐ Single taxane versus non‐taxane, non‐anthrycycline containing combination regimen 5 1202 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.48, 1.33]
3.4.3 Sub group G ‐ Single non‐taxane, non‐anthrycycline agent versus other combination regimen 7 797 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.28 [0.79, 2.08]
3.5 Overall response ‐ single agent taxane versus all combinations 8 2578 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.72, 1.48]
3.6 Overall response ‐ single agent anthracycline versus all combinations 20 3798 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.19 [1.06, 1.34]