Berruti D 2002.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Accrual (October 1995 ‐ March 2001) RCT ‐ Multicentre Randomisation not described (stratification by investigator site done prior to randomisation) Major clinical characteristics well balanced across the 2 arms | |
Participants | 185 women with measurable or assessable (WHO criteria) and histologically proven MBC
100% MBC
100% Firstline Randomised no: 1) n = 93 (median age = 59; 28‐75) 2) n = 92 (median age 57; 33‐75) |
|
Interventions | E vs E+CDDP 1) EPI only = 60 mg/m2 slow IV push on days 1 and 2 2) EPI+CDDP = EPI 60 mg/m2 slow IV push on days 1 and 2 + CDDP 30mg/m2 x 1hr IV infusion on days 1 and 2 CDDP and EPI infusions were repeated every 21 days A median of 6 cycles (1‐8) was given |
|
Outcomes | Survival ‐ Not reported for arm of interest.
PFS curve poor quality. Excluded. OR (CR + PR) 1) 47/93 2) 53/92 Toxicity: WHO 3‐4 Nausea and vomiting 1) 17/91 2) 24/90 Leukopenia 1) 2/91 2) 4/90 Toxic death 1) 3 2) 3 |
|
Notes | F/U TTP ‐ min 4.5mths ‐ max 64mths (estimated from no of cycles and curve) Patients randomised into 4 arms **** Only EPI and CDDP arms of this study included ITT ‐ stated in text | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing outcome data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All expected outcomes reported |