Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD003372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003372.pub3

Berruti D 2002.

Study characteristics
Methods Accrual (October 1995 ‐ March 2001)
RCT ‐ Multicentre Randomisation not described (stratification by investigator site done prior to randomisation)
Major clinical characteristics well balanced across the 2 arms
Participants 185 women with measurable or assessable (WHO criteria) and histologically proven MBC 
100% MBC
100% Firstline
Randomised no:
1) n = 93 (median age = 59; 28‐75)
2) n = 92 (median age 57; 33‐75)
Interventions E vs E+CDDP
1) EPI only = 60 mg/m2 slow IV push on days 1 and 2
2) EPI+CDDP = EPI 60 mg/m2 slow IV push on days 1 and 2 + CDDP 30mg/m2 x 1hr IV infusion on days 1 and 2
CDDP and EPI infusions were repeated every 21 days
A median of 6 cycles (1‐8) was given
Outcomes Survival ‐ Not reported for arm of interest. 
PFS curve poor quality. Excluded.
OR (CR + PR)
1) 47/93
2) 53/92
Toxicity: WHO 3‐4
Nausea and vomiting
1) 17/91
2) 24/90
Leukopenia 
1) 2/91
2) 4/90
Toxic death 
1) 3 
2) 3
Notes F/U TTP ‐ min 4.5mths ‐ max 64mths (estimated from no of cycles and curve) 
Patients randomised into 4 arms **** Only EPI and CDDP arms of this study included
ITT ‐ stated in text
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No missing outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All expected outcomes reported