Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD003372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003372.pub3

French Epi (A) 1991.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT ‐ Randomisation not described ‐ Stratified on the basis of bone mets/or not 
Multi centre 13 institutions, France
Baseline ‐ More lymph node mets in the FEC50 combination group
Participants 275 women with histologic evidence of breast cancer with recurrent or metastatic disease 
100% MBC
100% Firstline
Randomised no:
1) n = 140
2) n = 135
Assessable no:
1) n = 132 (median age 53; 26‐70).
(n) for effectiveness = 121; toxicity = 125
2) n = 129 (median age 53; 30‐70) (n) for effectiveness = 121; toxicity = 126
Interventions E vs FEC 50
1) Epirubicin 75 mg/m2 iv 
2) FEC 50 
Epirubicin 50 mg/m2 iv day 1 X 21 day cycle
+ 5‐Flurouracil 500 mg/m2 iv
+ Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2
(All treatments repeated every 21 days)
Outcomes Survival curve ‐ Kaplan‐Meier method ‐ ? from randomisation or? from treatment
TTF curve provided however as authors report this as TTP, this has been included
OR (CR+PR)
1) 37/121 duration of response = 315 days (range 84‐1107)
2) 54/121 duration of response = 378 days (range 84‐1008)
Toxicity
Treatment ceased due to cardiac toxicity in 15 patients (7 in the single group;3 in the combination group)
Nausea and vomiting and granulopenia reported by percentage of total cycles of chemotherapy
Toxic death‐ NR six cases of cardiac failure ‐ all controlled by symptomatic treatment
Notes F/U survival min 8mths (based on cycles) ‐ max ‐ 40mths (1200 days reported from curves)
F/U TTP min 4mths ‐ max 40mths based on curve
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Missing outcome data well balanced between the groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All expected outcomes reported