Heidemann E 2002.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Accrual (1992‐1997) RCT ‐ Random number generation ‐ central statistical institute ‐ stratified according to disease free state and metastases Germany, multi‐centre Groups well balanced except for receptor status | |
Participants | 260 women with measurable metastatic BC fulfilling high risk criteria previously untreated for MBC
Histologically documented ABC stage IV
Anthracycline naive
100% MBC
100% Firstline Randomised no: 1) 127 2) 133 Evaluable for efficacy and QOL 1) 119 2) 119 Evaluable for toxicity 1) 131 2) 125 |
|
Interventions | MZA vs FEC 1) Mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 IV by short infusion x21 days 2) FEC 5‐Flurouracil 500 mg/m2 IV + Epirubicin 50 mg/m2 + Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks, max 12 cycles 2nd and 3rd line treatment fixed |
|
Outcomes | Survival and TTP curves ‐ Kaplan‐Meier life table method ‐ from commencement of treatment Median survival 1) 14.1 mths 2) 15.8 mths Median TTP 1) 4.4 mths 2) 6.15 OR (CR + PR) 1) 30/119 2) 43/119 Toxicity (WHO 3‐4) Nausea /vomiting 1) 9/131 2)37/125 Alopecia 1)6/131 2) 77/125 Toxic death ‐ NR QOL ‐ Brunners score |
|
Notes | F/U survival and TTP min 0.99 ‐ max 73.68mths (Stated in text) | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random number generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Centrally randomised |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quorum of missing patients provided ‐ balanced across both groups unlikely to have a clinically relevant impact |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All expected outcomes reported |