Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;2019:4851323. doi: 10.1155/2019/4851323

Table 6.

Algorithm outcome with 2-fold validation to detect health impairment using the SVM algorithm.

Algorithm Step 1 – 2-class (good vs. impaired health) Step 2 – 3 class algorithm (impaired metabolic, vascular, or renal health)
Features Age, BMI, FL, and val Age, BMI, FL, and val
Health impairment All Metabolic Vascular Renal
Accuracy (%) 78.2 (77.7 – 78.7) 73.4 (72.9 – 74.0) 68.7 (68.1 – 69.3) 78.1 (75.5 – 78.7)
Sensitivity (%) 81.5 (80.4 – 82.6) 54.9 (53.1 – 56.8) 58.6 (57.2 – 60.0) 67.4 (65.9 – 68.7)
Specificity (%) 77.0 (76.3 – 77.7) 81.5 (80.4 – 82.6) 75.4 (74.2 – 76.6) 82.6 (81.7 – 83.5)
Positive likelihood ratio 3.67 (3.57 – 3.77) 3.43 (3.20 – 3.66) 2.64 (2.51 – 2.77) 4.59 (4.19 – 4.98)
Negative likelihood ratio 0.24 (0.22 – 0.25) 0.55 (0.53 – 0.57) 0.55 (0.53 – 0.56) 0.39 (0.38 – 0.41)
Positive predictive value (%) 57.7 (57.0 – 58.3) 57.8 (56.5 – 59.1) 62.3 (61.3 – 63.2) 63.0 (61.9 – 64.2)
Negative predictive value (%) 91.8 (91.4 – 92.2) 80.9 (80.4 – 81.4) 73.5 (72.9 – 74.0) 85.9 (85.2 – 86.5)
F-measure 0.67 (0.66 – 0.68) 0.55 (0.54 – 0.56) 0.60 (0.59 – 0.61) 0.64 (0.63 – 0.65)
Diagnostic odds ratio 14.7 (14.0 – 15.4) 5.4 (5.0 – 5.8) 4.3 (4.1 – 4.5) 9.8 (8.9 – 10.7)

Diagnostic performance data are reported as mean (95% CI) of 100 times repeated 2-fold validation experiments.