Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 1;11:95. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0555-3

Table 1.

Association and performance evaluation of DC-AD, DC-FTD, DC-DLB, and DC-other of each assessment section in predicting the corresponding “gold-standard” diagnosis

Assessment steps AUC (95%CI) OR (95%CI) p values*
Diagnosis of MCI-AD
 1. Clinical work-up 0.706 (0.637–0.775) 1.04 (1.02–1.05)
 2. Clinical work-up PLUS TMS 0.879 (0.809–0.950) 1.07 (1.05–1.10) 1 vs. 2, p < 0.001
 3. Clinical work-up PLUS amyloid markers 0.981 (0.953–1) 1.14 (1.09–1.22) 1 vs. 3, p < 0.001; 2 vs. 3, p < 0.010
 4. Clinical work-up PLUS TMS PLUS amyloid markers 0.975 (0.946–1) 1.10 (1.07–1.16) 4 vs. 1, p < 0.001; 4 vs. 2, p < 0.001
 5. Clinical work-up PLUS amyloid markers PLUS TMS 0.995 (0.986–1) 1.15 (1.09–1.38) 5 vs. 1, p < 0.001; 5 vs. 2, p < 0.001
Diagnosis of MCI-FTD
 1. Clinical work-up 0.796 (0.728–0.864) 1.05 (1.03–1.06)
 2. Clinical work-up PLUS TMS 0.913 (0.831–0.995) 1.08 (1.06–1.12) 1 vs. 2, p = 0.032
 3. Clinical work-up PLUS amyloid markers 0.910 (0.840–0.979) 1.07 (1.05–1.10) 3 vs. 1, p = 0.022
 4. Clinical work-up PLUS TMS PLUS amyloid markers 0.940 (0.868–1) 1.10 (1.06–1.16) 4 vs. 1, p = 0.005
 5. Clinical work-up PLUS amyloid markers PLUS TMS 0.910 (0.840–0.979) 1.10 (1.07–1.14) 5 vs. 1, p = 0.022
Diagnosis of MCI-DLB
 1. Clinical work-up 0.946 (0.907–0.946) 1.08 (1.06–1.11)
 2. Clinical work-up PLUS TMS 0.925 (0.836–1) 1.07 (1.04–1.10)
 3. Clinical work-up PLUS amyloid markers 0.983 (0.951–1) 1.08 (1.04–1.16)
 4. Clinical work-up PLUS TMS PLUS amyloid markers 0.925 (0.836–1) 1.07 (1.05–1.11)
 5. Clinical work-up PLUS amyloid markers PLUS TMS 0.998 (0.991–1) 1.33 (1.06–1.50)
Diagnosis of MCI-other
 1. Clinical work-up 0.752 (0.652–0.848) 1.04 (1.02–1.06)
 2. Clinical work-up PLUS TMS 0.889 (0.772–1) 1.08 (1.05–1.12)
 3. Clinical work-up PLUS amyloid markers 0.844 (0.729–0.959) 1.06 (1.04–1.08)
 4. Clinical work-up PLUS TMS PLUS amyloid markers 0.986 (0.965–1) 1.09 (1.06–1.15) 4 vs. 1, p < 0.001
 5. Clinical work-up PLUS amyloid markers PLUS TMS 0.957 (0.895–1) 1.09 (1.06–1.13) 5 vs. 1, p < 0.001

Association was evaluated by odds ratio (OR) of logistic regression models; the performance was evaluated through AUC values of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves

DC diagnostic confidence, MCI-AD mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease, MCI-FTD mild cognitive impairment due to frontotemporal dementia, MCI-DLB mild cognitive impairment due to dementia with Lewy bodies, MCI-other mild cognitive impairment due to other conditions, AUC area under the curve, CI confidence interval, TMS transcranial magnetic stimulation

*AUC comparisons: p value of significantly different AUC