Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 2;2019(12):CD004542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004542.pub3

Summary of findings 4. Relaxation techniques versus usual care.

Relaxation techniques versus usual care for depression in people treated with dialysis
Patient or population: people with ESKD
Settings: dialysis
Intervention: relaxation techniques1
Comparison: usual care
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No. of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Usual care Relaxation techniques
Major depression No data observations Not estimable No observations Insufficient data observations Not estimable Studies were not designed to measure effects of relaxation techniques on major depression
Depression (any severity, including mild, moderate and severe depression)
Investigators measured depression using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). A higher score is indicative of more depressive symptoms.
(median follow‐up: 4.2 weeks)
The mean depression score ranged across control groups from 9.56 to 30.83 The mean depression score in the intervention group was
5.77 lower (95% CI ‐8.76 to ‐2.78)
MD ‐5.77
(95% CI ‐8.76 to ‐2.78)
122 (2) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate 2 Relaxation techniques probably decrease depressive symptoms
HRQoL
Investigators measured health‐related quality of life using the Health Status Questionnaire Short Form (SF‐36)
(median follow‐up: 6 weeks)
Not estimable3 Not estimable No observations Insufficient data observations Not estimable Studies were not designed to measure effects of relaxation techniques on HRQoL
Anxiety No data observations Not estimable No observations Insufficient data observations Not estimable Studies were not designed to measure effects of relaxation techniques on anxiety
Withdrawal from dialysis No data observations Not estimable No observations Insufficient data observations Not estimable Studies were not designed to measure effects of relaxation techniques on withdrawal from dialysis
Withdrawal from intervention No data observations Not estimable No observations Insufficient data observations Not estimable Studies were not designed to measure effects of relaxation techniques on withdrawal from intervention
Death (any cause) No data observations Not estimable No observations Insufficient data observations Not estimable Studies were not designed to measure effects of relaxation techniques death
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 ESKD: end‐stage kidney disease; CI: Confidence interval; MD: mean difference; HRQoL: health‐related quality of life
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Relaxation techniques included Benson relaxation technique and nurse‐led breathing training.

2 Studies had high or unclear risks of bias for allocation concealment, blinding of participants or investigators, and blinding of outcome assessment.

3 Treatment effects on HRQoL was not estimable as a single study reported this outcome.