Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 2;2019(12):CD004542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004542.pub3

Bargiel‐Matusiewicz 2011a.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Time frame: not reported

  • Follow‐up period: 5 weeks

Participants
  • Country: not reported

  • Setting: not reported

  • Inclusion criteria: 171 fully informed and consenting patients with ESKD and with multiple sclerosis

  • Number (analysed/randomised): not reported/171

  • Mean age ± SD (years): not reported

  • Sex (M/F): not reported

  • Antidepressant medication: not reported

  • Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions Treatment group
  • Psychological intervention (not described)


Control group
  • Usual care


Co‐interventions
  • Not reported

Outcomes
  • Acceptance of illness

    • AIS

Notes
  • Abstract‐only publication

  • Funding source: not reported

  • Trial registration identification number: not reported

  • Corresponding author: not reported.

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Sequence generation methods were not reported in sufficient detail to perform an adjudication
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment was not reported in sufficient detail to perform an adjudication
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding of participants and/or the investigators was not reported. However, the methods of intervention and control treatment were physically different, and therefore masking of intervention was unlikely
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk The AIS was a self‐reported measurement. As such, the outcome assessment was conducted by participants who could be aware of the treatment received. We judged the outcome assessment to be at high risk of bias for these outcome measures
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported in sufficient detail to perform an adjudication
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Not reported in sufficient detail to perform an adjudication
Other bias Unclear risk It was not clear if there was evidence of imbalance at baseline. Not reported in sufficient detail to perform an adjudication