Kouidi 2010.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "Fifty participants met these criteria and were assigned to either an exercise training (group A) or to a sedentary control group (group B) through complete randomisation." Comment: Sequence generation methods were not reported in sufficient detail to perform an adjudication |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of allocation concealment was not reported in sufficient detail to perform an adjudication |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Blinding of participants and/or the investigators was not reported. The methods of intervention and control treatment were physically different. Participants and investigators could be aware on the treatment allocation group |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI‐II) is a self‐rating questionnaire for the assessment of the severity of depression. [...] The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self‐administered questionnaire for assessing depression and anxiety of general hospital patients." Comment: The BDI‐II and the HADS were completed by participants. Participants were aware of the intervention they received. Therefore, the outcome assessment for depression and anxiety was not blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "In 24 patients of group A (one dropped out of the exercise training program), a final similar exercise test was carried out after the completion of the last training session. Five patients of group B were lost to follow‐up." Comment: 1/24 in the intervention group and 5/20 in the control group were lost to the follow‐up (> 10% loss to follow‐up; there was a differential loss between groups) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | There was no published protocol for this study. This study reported many patient‐centred outcomes that might be expected for a study of this type (i.e. depression; anxiety; adverse events) |
Other bias | Low risk | No evidence of other sources of bias |