Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 2;14(12):e0224895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224895

Fig 3. Method comparison.

Fig 3

One-hundred-eightysix samples measured with both assays. Panel A shows the raw data. Below 1000 there is a fairly linear correlation, but in the higher range the Calprest assay measures higher values than Calpro. After ln transformation of the raw data, a significant linear trend can be seen in panel B. Dashed line is line of identity.