Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 14;9(11):e034225. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034225

Table 5B.

Results of the order regression analysis between different dimensions of PPE-15 and overall satisfaction

Estimate SE Wald df Significance 95% CI
Lower Upper
Dependent Variable: overall satisfaction (very dissatisfied as reference category)
(Very dissatisfied) 5.63 0.65 74.02 1.00 0.00 4.34 6.91
(Dissatisfied) 6.90 0.63 121.27 1.00 0.00 5.67 8.13
(Satisfied) 11.07 0.71 246.18 1.00 0.00 9.69 12.46
(Very satisfied)
Independent Variables: dimensions of PPE-15
S1 0.20 0.06 11.01 1.00 0.00 0.08 0.32
S2 0.30 0.06 25.44 1.00 0.00 0.18 0.41
S3 0.27 0.04 40.00 1.00 0.00 0.19 0.36
S4 0.28 0.08 13.27 1.00 0.00 0.13 0.43
S5 0.26 0.06 17.70 1.00 0.00 0.14 0.39
S6 0.29 0.06 22.07 1.00 0.00 0.17 0.41

Link function: logistic regression; Pseudo R2=0.317, S1, information transmission and patient education; S2, respect for patient preference; S3, emotional support; S4, physical comfort; S5, involvement of family or friends; and S6, continuity of medical service.

*Significant at the 95% level.

†Very dissatisfied as reference category.

CI, Confidence Interval; G, gamma coefficient; PPE, Picker Patient Experience; SE, Std. Error.