Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e030968. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030968

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of burnout and defensive medical practice stratified by demographic variables

Burnout* (%) Avoidance† (%) Hedging‡ (%) Any DMP§ (%)
Age (years)
 <35 (n=948) 440 (46%) 37 (4%) 93 (10%) 115 (12%)
 35–49 (n=1209) 395 (33%) 68 (6%) 114 (9%) 151 (12%)
 ≥50 (n=916) 281 (31%) 91 (10%) 82 (9%) 134 (15%)
Gender
 Female (n=2069) 763 (37%) 105 (5%) 179 (9%) 239 (12%)
 Male (n=963) 332 (34%) 87 (9%) 102 (11%) 152 (16%)
Ethnicity
 White (n=1767) 723 (41%) 114 (6%) 159 (9%) 227 (13%)
 Asian (n=832) 229 (28%) 49 (6%) 79 (9%) 105 (13%)
 Black (n=201) 57 (28%) 10 (5%) 17 (8%) 21 (10%)
 Mixed (n=172) 59 (34%) 14 (8%) 23 (13%) 31 (18%)
 Other (n=82) 39 (48%) 3 (4%) 7 (9%) 8 (10%)
Children
 No (n=1023) 473 (46%) 48 (5%) 96 (9%) 126 (12%)
 Yes (n=2050) 643 (31%) 148 (7%) 193 (9%) 274 (13%)
R elationship
 No (n=601) 266 (44%) 32 (5%) 51 (8%) 74 (12%)
 Yes (n=2464) 844 (34%) 161 (7%) 237 (10%) 323 (13%)
Country of q ualification
 UK/Ireland (n=1996) 841 (42%) 125 (6%) 193 (10%) 265 (13%)
 Other (n=1075) 273 (25%) 71 (7%) 96 (9%) 135 (13%)
Work status
 Full time (n=2551) 952 (37%) 161 (6%) 248 (10%) 341 (13%)
 Less than full time (n=519) 163 (31%) 35 (7%) 41 (8%) 59 (11%)
Subspecialty (consultants)
 None (n=1278) 404 (32%) 116 (9 %) 151 (12%) 213 (17%)
 Maternal/fetal (n=56) 20 (36%) 3 (5%) 7 (12.5%) 8 (14%)
 Sexual/reproductive health (n=34) 10 (29%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%)
 Gynaecological oncology (n=33) 8 (24%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%)
 Reproductive medicine (n=33) 9 (27%) 2 (6%) 0 2 (6%)
 Urogynaecology (n=28) 9 (32%) 4 (14%) 4 (14 %) 6 (21%)

*Positive for burnout if emotional exhaustion score ≥27 (range 0–54) and/or depersonalisation score ≥10 (range 0–30) in accordance with the Maslach Burnout Inventory.

†Defined as avoidance score of ≥13 (range 0–36).

‡Defined as hedging score of ≥5 (range 0–12).

§Defined as presence of avoidance and/or hedging (as defined).

DMP, Defensive Medical Practice.