Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e030968. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030968

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics of defensive practice by burnout status

Doctor category Avoidance* Hedging† Any DMP‡
Burnout status§ Mean score % elevated Mean score % elevated %
Consultant
 No burnout (n=1002) 1.05 53 (5%) 3.95 67 (7%) 101 (10%)
 Burnout (n=460) 2.14 72 (16%) 7.79 97 (21%) 130 (28%)
SAS
 No burnout (n=178) 0.72 3 (2%) 1.74 2 (1%) 5 (3%)
 Burnout (n=76) 1.92 10 (13%) 5.34 9 (12%) 15 (20%)
Trainees
 No burnout (n=777) 0.59 15 (2%) 3.30 25 (3%) 36 (5%)
 Burnout (n=580) 1.38 43 (7%) 6.46 89 (15%) 113 (19%)
All doctors
 No burnout (n=1957) 0.84 71 (4%) 3.49 94 (5%) 142 (7%)
 Burnout (n=1116) 1.73 125 (11%) 6.93 195 (17%) 258 (23%)
OR¶ (95%  CI ) 3.34 (2.48 to 4.53) 4.18 (3.24 to 5.43) 3.84 (3.08 to 4.79)

*Scores of ≥13 (range 0–36) are considered elevated and indicate avoidance behaviour.

†Scores of ≥5 (range 0–12) are considered elevated and indicate hedging behaviour.

‡Defined as elevated levels of avoidance and/or hedging behaviour.

§Burnout defined as an emotional exhaustion score ≥27 (range 0-54) and/or depersonalisation score ≥10 (range 0–30) in accordance with the Maslach Burnout Inventory.

¶ORs are based on univariable logistic regression with Firth bias correction.

DMP, Defensive Medical Practice; SAS, Specialty and Associate Specialist Doctors.