Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 8;16(22):4358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224358

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies in the meta-analysis.

Study, Year of Publication Level of Physical Activity Vaginal Delivery Country of the Study Type of Training C PFT n ♀ (%) Age (Years) BMI (cm/kg2)
Aksac, 2003 [41] Sedentary 2.8 ± 0.5 Turkey PFT (a) 10 20 100 52.5 ± 7.9 N/A
3.5 ± 1.1 PFTBi (b) 20 51.6 ± 5.8 N/A
Aukee et al. 2002 [42] Sedentary 2.2 (0–5) Finland Bi (a) - 15 100 35–61 21–36
3.2 (0–7) PFT (b) 15 31–69 21–36
Borello-France et al. 2006 [43] Sedentary no EEUU SuPFT (a) - 22 100 51.7 ± 8.9 N/A
no SuVPFT (b) 22 53.6 ± 8.1 N/A
Castro et al. 2008 [44] Sedentary 2.8 ± 1.9 Brazil PFT (a) 30 31 100 56.2 ± 12.5 25.9 ± 5.0
3.5 ± 2.6 ES (b) 30 55.2 ± 12.8 21.9 ± 3.9
3.0 ± 2.1 VC (c) 27 52.6 ± 11.2 24.1 ±4.6
De Oliveira et al. 2009 [45] Sedentary 2.7 ± 2.4 Brazil GPFT (a) - 30 100 51.6 ± 9.6 26.8 ± 4.5
2.6 ± 2.1 IPFT (b) 30 50.3 ± 8.7 25.5 ± 4.7
Ferguson et al., 1990 [46] Sedentary 1.7 ± 1.4 EEUU PFTIB (a) - 10 100 37.1 ± 6.4 N/A
1.9 ± 1.0 PFT (b) 10 35.8 ± 4.6 N/A
Ferreira et al., 2012 [47] Sedentary 2.47 ± 1.2 Portugal PFTS (a) - 17 100 50.7 ± 9.3 29.2 ± 4.7
2.24 ± 1.0 PFT (b) 17 53.9 ± 8.7 27.2 ± 4.1
Hirakawa et al., 2013 [48] Sedentary 2.1 ± 0.6 Japan PFT (a) - 23 100 58.3 ± 11.2 22.5 ± 2.3
2.2 ± 0.7 PFTBi (b) 23 55.3 ± 9.8 23.9 ± 4.2
Pereira et al., 2011 [49] Sedentary 1.46 ± 1.5 Brazil GPFT (a) 15 17 100 60.2 ± 8.2 26.03 ± 3.6
1.26 ± 1.3 PFT (b) 17 60.6 ± 12.6 26.26 ± 2.79
Konstantinidou, 2007 [50] Sedentary no Greece PFT (a) - 10 100 47.8 ± 7.5 N/A
no PFTS (b) 12

Data are the mean, mean ± SD or n. a All characteristics refer to the CT group. C, control group; PFT, pelvic floor training group. Ba, Balloon; Bi, Biofeedback; F, Floor; G, Group; I, Individual; P, Pelvic; S, Supervised; T, Training; VC, Vaginal Cone; Su, Supine; V, Vertical; N/A, Not appear; ES, Electrical Stimulation.