Table 10.
Presentation of the contingency table (A2a vs A3b) before and after the clarification of quality principles and the targeted search for these quality principles.
| A2 (before) | A3 (after): Group A (N=220), n (%) | A3 (after): Group B (N=221), n (%) | ||||||
|
|
Insufficient | Do not know | Sufficient | Total | Insufficient | Do not know | Sufficient | Total |
| Insufficient | 145 (65.9) | 3 (1.4) | 7 (3.2) | 155 (70.5) | 136 (61.5) | 1 (0.5) | 6 (2.7) | 143 (64.7) |
| Do not know | 9 (4.1) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 11 (5.0) | 2 (0.9) | 6 (2.7) | 7 (3.2) | 15 (6.8) |
| Sufficient | 14 (6.4) | 2 (0.9) | 38 (17.3) | 54 (24.5) | 16 (7.2) | 2 (0.9) | 45 (20.4) | 63 (28.5) |
| Total | 168 (76.4) | 6 (2.7) | 46 (20.9) | 220 (100) | 154 (69.7) | 9 (4.1) | 58 (26.2) | 221 (100) |
aA2: assessment 2.
bA3: assessment 3.