Table 2.
Facility characteristics | ANZ | Canada | Japan | Thailand | UK | USA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of facilities | 18 | 20 | 28 | 22 | 17 | 65 |
Record and track peritonitis episodes, % | 100 | 100 | 61 | 96 | 100 | 100 |
Record and track exit-site infection episodes, % | 100 | 95 | 41 | 91 | 88 | 98 |
Frequency of calculating peritonitis rates, % | ||||||
At least annually | 94 | 95 | 14 | 86 | 94 | 99 |
Less often than annually | 6 | 5 | 43 | 14 | 6 | 0 |
Never | 0 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Frequency of calculating exit-site infection rates, % | ||||||
At least annually | 89 | 90 | 7 | 91 | 82 | 97 |
Less often than annually | 11 | 5 | 29 | 5 | 6 | 0 |
Never | 0 | 5 | 64 | 5 | 12 | 3 |
Target peritonitis rate, median (IQR) episode per patient yeara, median (IQR) | 0.33 (0.25–0.50) | 0.39 (0.25–0.50) | 0.21 (0.20–0.30) | 0.50 (0.40–0.67) | 0.55 (0.41–0.67) | 0.33 (0.13–0.40) |
Self-reported peritonitis rate above targeta, % | 46 | 22 | 50 | 12 | 36 | 50 |
Among facilities that routinely record and track peritonitis episodes. IQR, Interquartile range.