Damjanovic 2009.
Methods | Randomised controlled, parallel group trial | |
Participants | N = 100 participants (78 M/22 F); mean age 57; BMI 31 kg/m2 Inclusion criteria: AHI > 15, with or without corresponding daytime symptoms Exclusion criteria: 1. global respiratory failure; 2. central sleep apnoea syndrome; 3. severe mental or psychological impairment |
|
Interventions | 4 groups. Autoadjusting CPAP with or without intensive support versus fixed CPAP with or without intensive support Study duration: 9 months |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Funding & conflicts of interest statements | Information not available (link to declarations of interest no longer live) | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Pulling mixed and sealed envelopes" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Pulling mixed and sealed envelopes... At time of recruitment, recruiters were also unaware of allocation." |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Machine usage, symptoms, quality of life, withdrawal, adverse effects | High risk | Quote: "Patients were not told about their pressure mode, however, full blinding of pressure delivery was not possible. At time of recruitment, recruiters were also unaware of allocation." |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) AHI, blood pressure, treatment pressure | Low risk | Awareness of treatment group assignment unlikely to affect objective outcome data from the study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Machine usage, symptoms, quality of life, withdrawal, adverse effects | High risk | Quote: "Outcome assessors were not blinded" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) AHI, blood pressure, treatment pressure | Low risk | These outcomes unlikely to be affected by awareness of treatment group. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | No information on withdrawals provided |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No concerns identified |