Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 8;16(22):4363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224363

Table 6.

Joint percentage distribution between heating type and clusters.

Heating Type Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Heating Marginal
Non-electric 0.69 {6}
(0.85) a {7}
9.94 {86}
(9.37) {81}
50.75 {439}
(51.17) {443}
61.38 {531}
Mixed 0.23 {2}
(0.24) {2}
0.92 {8}
(2.66) {23}
16.30 {141}
(14.55) {126}
17.45 {151}
Electric 0.47 {4}
(0.30) {3}
4.40 {38}
(3.23) {28}
16.30 {141}
(17.63) {152}
21.17 {183}
Cluster marginal 1.39 {12} 15.26 {132} 83.35 {721} 100.00 b {865}

a Numbers under () brackets are the expected percentages and are calculated by multiplying the heating marginal by the corresponding cluster marginal; the corresponding number of children is displayed under {} brackets. b Percentages are calculated on 865 cases instead of 884 because for 19 cases we had no information on heating type (we only know that it is collective heating).