Table 3.
Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between functional status and BMI in overweight/obese FMS patients and healthy women.
| Functional Status Variables | Overweight/Obese Women with FMS (n = 24) | Overweight/Obese Healthy Women (n = 12) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p-Value | r | p-Value | |
| MiniBESTest (score) | −0.281 | 0.183 | −0.374 | 0.231 |
| TUG (s) | −0.029 | 0.897 | −0.322 | 0.307 |
| TUG-manual (s) | −0.051 | 0.818 | −0.201 | 0.531 |
| TUG-cognitive (s) | 0.162 | 0.460 | −0.149 | 0.645 |
| One leg stance-right (s) | −0.169 | 0.441 | −0.108 | 0.738 |
| One leg stance-left (s) | −0.267 | 0.218 | 0.081 | 0.804 |
| HAQ-DI (score) | 0.187 | 0.442 | −0.124 | 0.700 |
| Spinal Flexion (°) | −0.241 | 0.256 | 0.236 | 0.484 |
| Spinal Extension (°) | −0.163 | 0.446 | 0.749 | 0.008 |
| Total range of spinal inclination (°) | −0.249 | 0.241 | 0.434 | 0.183 |
| LTPAI total (score) | −0.008 | 0.976 | 0.337 | 0.283 |
| PAHWI (total) | 0.225 | 0.386 | 0.187 | 0.561 |
TUG: Timed up and Go; HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; LTPAI: Leisure Time Physical Activity; PAHWI: Physical Activity at Home and Work. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r) was calculated.