Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 16;16(22):4540. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224540

Table 4.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between functional status and BMI in normal-weight FMS patients and healthy women.

Functional Status Variables Normal-Weight Women with FMS (n = 10) Normal-Weight Healthy Women (n = 10)
r p-Value r p-Value
MiniBESTest (score) −0.269 0.452 0.181 0.617
TUG (s) 0.341 0.334 0.356 0.313
TUG-manual (s) 0.348 0.325 0.299 0.401
TUG-cognitive (s) 0.450 0.192 0.488 0.153
One leg stance-right (s) −0.411 0.238 0.311 0.381
One leg stance-left (s) −0.256 0.475 0.311 0.381
HAQ-DI (score) −0.025 0.949 −0.493 0.148
Spinal Flexion (°) 0.134 0.713 −0.286 0.493
Spinal Extension (°) −0.153 0.673 −0.479 0.230
Total range of spinal inclination (°) 0.188 0.603 −0.357 0.385
LTPAI total (score) 0.252 0.548 0.337 0.283
PAHWI (total) 0.095 0.823 0.187 0.561

TUG: Timed up and Go; HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; LTPAI: Leisure Time Physical Activity; PAHWI: Physical Activity at Home and Work. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r) was calculated.