. 2019 Nov 18;20(22):5796. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225796

Table 3.

Parameter estimates and likelihood values for NtCCDs using the site model.

Model	Np	Ln L	Estimates of Parameters	RT Pairs	LRT p-Value	Positive Sites
M0: one ratio	38	−13,579.23	ω0 = 0.09246
M3: discrete	42	−13,413.93	p0 = 0.14105, p1 = 0.62465, p2 = 0.23430,	M0 vs. M3	0.00	None
M3: discrete	42	−13,413.93	ω0 = 0.01164, ω1 = 0.06928, ω2 = 0.25309	M0 vs. M3	0.00	None
M2a: selection	41	−13,554.18	p0 = 0.935245, p1 = 0.03719, p2 = 0.02757,
M2a: selection	41	−13,554.18	ω0 = 0.08829, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2 = 1.00000
M1a: neutral	39	−13,554.18	p0 = 0.93524, p1 = 0.06476,	M1a vs. M2a	1.00	None
M1a: neutral	39	−13,554.18	ω0 = 0.08829, ω1 = 1.00000	M1a vs. M2a	1.00	None
M8: beta and ω > 1	41	−13,430.72	p0 = 0.99883, p = 1.12281, q = 9.15782,	M7 vs. M8	0.9839	None
M8: beta and ω > 1	41	−13,430.72	p1 = 0.00117, ω = 1.00000	M7 vs. M8	0.9839	None
M7: beta	39	−13,430.73	p = 1.11747, q = 9.06492
M8a: beta and ω = 1	40	−13,419.70	p0 = 0.99999, p = 1.35368, q = 11.54435,	M8a vs. M8	0.000002674	None
M8a: beta and ω = 1	40	−13,419.70	p1 = 0.0000, ω = 1.00000	M8a vs. M8	0.000002674	None