Table 1.
Stem cell sources in pre-clinical trials.
| Stem cell source | References | Advantages and disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Embryonic stem cells | 90 | Advantages: Ability to differentiate into any cell line Disadvantages: Controversial harvesting, potentially tumorigenic |
| Induced pluripotent fibroblasts | 91, 93, 95 | Advantages: No ethical problem with harvesting, immunogenicity. Disadvantages: Induction of pluripotency may take longer and not as efficient. |
| Induced pluripotent keratinocytes | 92, 94 | Advantages: No ethical problems with harvesting, improved production of IPSCs compared to fibroblasts. Disadvantages: May be difficult to harvest and isolate from samples, slower growth and replication. |
| Hematopoeitic stem cells | 96, 97, 98 | Advantages: CD44 allows homing to sites of inflammation, potentially allowing injection rather than topical application. Disadvantages: Have only shown ability to differentiate into blood cells, hepatocytes, and fibroblasts |
| Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells | 99, 100, 101 | Advantages: Rapid proliferation, wide differentiation capacity, anti-inflammatory effects. Disadvantages: More difficult to harvest than AMSCs. |
| Adipocyte mesenchymal stem cells | 99, 100, 102 | Advantages: Ease of harvest, rapid proliferation, wide differentiation capacity, angiogenic properties. Disadvantages: Decreased proliferation and density compared to BMMSCs. May have poorer anti-inflammatory effects. |
| Urine derived stem cells | 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 | Advantages: Extreme ease of harvest, ability to form urothelial, endothelial, smooth muscle, or even neural lineages. Disadvantages: Varying isolation efficiency, increased heterogeneity of cell lines, lack of data on long term effectiveness of USC grafts |