. 2019 Sep 5;3(12):1900013. doi: 10.1002/gch2.201900013

Table 3.

Effect of Zn‐coated urea materials on Zn use efficiencies. Means in a column with at least one letter common are not statistically significant using Fisher's least significant difference

Treatment	RE_Zn ^a) [%]	AE_Zn ^b) [kg grain increased kg⁻¹ Zn applied)	PFP_Zn ^c) [kg grain kg⁻¹ Zn applied]	HI_Zn ^d) [%]
Absolute control	–	–	–	23.7^B
Prilled urea	–	–	–	25.3^A
0.5% ZnCU (ZnSHH)	2.73^C	148.7^CD	3524.8^A	25.4^A
0.5% ZnCU (ZnO)	2.34^E	134.7^F	3510.6^A	25.3^A
1.0% ZnCU (ZnSHH)	2.90^AB	166.1^A	1848.0^B	25.3^A
1.0% ZnCU (ZnO)	2.66^C	159.0^B	1841.0^B	25.5^A
1.5% ZnCU (ZnSHH)	2.98^A	153.3^C	1275.9^C	25.3^A
1.5% ZnCU (ZnO)	2.71^C	146.2^DE	1268.9^C	25.5^A
2.0% ZnCU (ZnSHH)	2.88^AB	141.6^E	984.1^D	25.4^A
2.0% ZnCU (ZnO)	2.68^C	134.5^F	977.0^DE	25.3^A
2.5% ZnCU (ZnSHH)	2.77^BC	120.4^G	794.6^E	25.0^A
2.5% ZnCU (ZnO)	2.51^D	116.1^G	790.5^E	25.3^A

^{^a)}

RE: Recovery efficiency

^{^b)}

AE: Agronomic efficiency

^{^c)}

PFP: Partial factor productivity

^{^d)}

HI: Harvest index.