Table 4.
City | Educational attainment (reference: < high school graduate) |
|
---|---|---|
F(34, 9368) = 2.35*** | ||
High school graduate or some college | College degree or higher | |
eb (e95% CI) | eb (e95% CI) | |
Adelaide (AU) | 1.09 (0.95, 1.25) | 1.02 (0.90, 1.16) |
Ghent (BE) | 1.05 (0.74, 1.49) | 0.96 (0.68, 1.35) |
Curitiba (BR) | 1.10 (0.84, 1.44) | 1.01 (0.78, 1.31) |
Bogota (CO) | 0.99 (0.81, 1.22) | 1.44 (1.13, 1.81)** |
Olomouc (CZ) | 0.80 (0.57, 1.14) | 0.74 (0.51, 1.08) |
Hradec Králové (CZ) | 0.98 (0.56, 1.71) | 1.13 (0.61, 2.06) |
Aarhus (DK) | 0.73 (0.52, 1.03) | 0.69 (0.49, 0.98)* |
Hong Kong (HK) | 0.91 (0.66, 1.26) | 0.73 (0.54, 0.97)* |
Cuernavaca (MX) | 1.21 (0.94, 1.57) | 1.32 (1.02, 1.70)* |
North Shore (NZ) | 1.27 (0.68, 2.36) | 1.10 (0.59, 2.05) |
Waitakere (NZ) | 1.62 (1.00, 2.61)* | 1.82 (1.11, 2.98)* |
Wellington (NZ) | 2.44 (0.81, 7.42) | 2.13 (0.70, 6.47) |
Christchurch (NZ) | 1.41 (0.95, 2.09) | 1.52 (0.99, 2.30) |
Pamplona (ES) | 0.87 (0.64, 1.17) | 0.64 (0.48, 0.85)** |
Stoke-on-Trent (UK) | 0.85 (0.69, 1.05) | 0.87 (0.66, 1.15) |
Seattle (US) | 0.75 (0.42, 1.34) | 0.66 (0.37, 1.17) |
Baltimore (US) | 0.88 (0.49, 1.58) | 0.81 (0.45, 1.45) |
95% CI = 95% confidence interval; exp.(b) exponential function of regression coefficient; exp.(95% CI) = exponential function of confidence interval. Generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) with Gamma variance and logarithmic link functions, for which exp.(b) is interpreted as the proportional increase in PA associated with a 1 unit increase in the predictor. GAMMs adjusted for working status, marital status, administrative-unit-level socio-economic status and walkability
* p-value ranging from ≤.05 to >.01; ** p-value ranging from ≤01 to >.001; *** p ≤ .001