Transwell model |
Pros |
Pros |
Pros |
• Easy to operate |
• High throughput |
• Easy to recover the cells |
• No instruments required |
• No air bubble formation |
|
• No tubing and connection |
|
Cons |
• Cell seeding is easy |
Cons |
• Additional transfer step required for observation |
Cons |
• Frequent medium change for long term culture |
|
• Static culture |
• Gravity influence |
|
• No physiologically relevant |
• Can mimic only one step of the metastatic cascade |
|
Current microfluidic-based metastasis model |
Pros |
Pros |
Pros |
• Dynamic culture |
• Real-time monitoring |
• Compatible with microscope |
• Co-culture |
• Can generate a concentration gradient |
Cons |
• Physiologically relevant |
• Can mimic 1–2 steps of the metastatic cascade |
• Difficult to recover the cells |
Cons |
Cons |
|
• Fabricated from PDMS |
• Low throughput |
|
• Requires trained personnel to operate and assemble |
• Air bubble formation can ruin the experiment |
|
• Requires a perfusion pump and other instruments |
|
|
• Requires more attention for cell seeding |
|
|
This work |
Pros |
Pros |
Pros |
• Fabricated from acrylic and PET |
• Can perform long-term culture |
• Easy to recover the cells |
• Easy to operate using a plug-and-play design |
• No air bubble formation |
• Can collect circulating cells |
• Cell seeding is easy |
• Real-time monitoring |
Cons |
• Dynamic culture |
• Can mimic almost the entire cascade |
• Additional transfer step required for observation |
• Co-culture |
Cons |
|
• Physiologically relevant |
• Requires a medium reservoir for long term culture |
|
Cons |
|
|
• Requires a perfusion pump |
|
|
• Requires a tubing connection |
|
|
• Additional step for cell seeding |
|
|