Table 3.
Decomposing mental health gap between native-born and Nordic-, European- and non-European persons in Sweden
| Nordic | European | non-European | ||||
| GHQ foreign-born, mean (=n) | .35 | (1321) | .39 | (1763) | .39 | (1388) |
| GHQ native-born, mean (=n) | .31 | (60681) | .31 | (60681) | .31 | (60681) |
| Difference in GHQ | .05* | .08* | .08* | |||
| Explanatory variables | Contribution to explained health gap (%) | Contribution to explained health gap (%) | Contribution to explained health gap (%) | |||
| Labour market position (Employed as reference) | ||||||
| Unemployed | .002* | 4% | .005* | 6% | .014* | 17% |
| Outside the labour market | .008* | 18% | .007* | 8% | .016* | 19% |
| Economic hardship | ||||||
| Difficulty making ends meet | .007* | 16% | .009* | 11% | .018* | 21% |
| Low cash margin | .003* | 6% | .004* | 5% | .010* | 12% |
| Psychosocial working conditions | ||||||
| Lack of support from co-workers | .000 | 0% | .000 | 0% | −.000 | 0% |
| Lack of support from manager | −.001 | −1% | .000 | 0% | .001* | 1% |
| Low job satisfaction | .001 | 3% | .006* | 7% | .006* | 7% |
| Social relations | ||||||
| Low social activity | .013* | 28% | .011* | 13% | .019* | 22% |
| Low social support | .009* | 19% | .008* | 9% | .019* | 22% |
| Low practical support | .003* | 7% | .005* | 5% | .009* | 10% |
| Low trust in others | .005* | 11% | .015* | 17% | .016* | 19% |
| Experiences of discrimination | −.000 | −1% | .007* | 9% | .008* | 10% |
| Sociodemographic characteristics | ||||||
| Sex (men as reference) | .002* | 4% | −.001 | −1% | −.001 | −2% |
| Married/cohabiting | .000 | 0% | .001* | 1% | .001* | 1% |
| Age | .005* | 10% | −.001* | −1% | −.003* | −4% |
| Occupational class | −.001 | −1% | −.001 | −1% | −.002* | −2% |
| Income | .000 | 0% | .000 | 0% | .000 | 0% |
| Compulsory education | ||||||
| Secondary education | −.000 | 0% | −.000 | 0% | −.001 | −1% |
| Post-secondary education | −.002* | −4% | .003* | 4% | .001* | 2% |
Non-linear Oaxaca decomposition presented as log odds (%)). The relative contribution of each explanatory variable was calculated as the share (%) of the total difference in psychological distress
*denotes p < 0.05