Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 2;10:42. doi: 10.1186/s13229-019-0292-2

Table 1.

Optimized design and schedule for our visual transitive inference touchscreen task in mice

Stage Design Trials/session Performance criterion

Training stage 1:

Stimulus exposure

Exposure to all stimulus pairs to facilitate flexibility: 1 session of each stimulus pair in order: A+B; B+C; C+D; D+E 52 trials/session; Total 4 sessions None
Training stage 2: Premise stimulus pair learning Learning each pairwise discrimination to criterion in order: A+B; B+C; C+D; D+E 52 trials/session; until criterion ≥ 41/52 correct (79% accuracy) in a session, plus one of the two previous or successive sessions at ≥ 34/52 correct (≥ 65% accuracy)

Training stage 3:

Serial integration

All stimulus pairs presented in serial order: A+ B; B+ C; C+ D; D+ E then sequence repeated with 13 trials of each pair presented within a session 52 trials/session; until criterion ≥ 37/52 correct (≥ 70% accuracy) in a session or max. 15 sessions (780 trials)
Training stage 4: Pseudorandom integration All stimulus pairs (A+B; B+C; C+D-; D+E) presented in pseudorandom order with 13 trials of each pair presented within a session 52 trials/session; until criterion ≥ 37/52 correct (≥ 70% accuracy) in a session or max. 15 sessions (780 trials)
Transitive Inference Test 20 unrewarded trials each of novel pairs AE and BD; 8 trials each of the learned pairs (A+B, B+C, C+D, D+E); all pairs presented in pseudorandom order within a session 72 trials/session; 1 session None