Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 3;20:627. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3217-3

Table 1.

Performance comparison on maximum F1 score with existing models

Methods Team F R P
SVM-based TEES [5] 42.27 38.35 61.61
VERSE [6] 55.80 61.50 51.00
DL-based DUTIR [15] 47.80 39.70 60.00
TurkuNLP [16] 52.10 44.80 62.30
DET-BLSTM [17] 57.14 57.99 56.32
BGRU-Attn [18] 57.42 69.82 48.76
Our model 60.77 65.28 56.85

The listed results derive from the corresponding papers. F: F1 score; R: recall; P: precision. Our model used all of the proposed contributions (the results from the last row in Table 6). The highest scores are highlighted in bold