Skip to main content
. 2019 May 1;19:100146. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2019.100146

Table 1.

Studies on genetics in the context of cognitive remediation therapies in schizophrenia.

Sample Intervention/approach Gene Variants Comparisons Results Effect size CTAM index
Bosia et al. (2007) SCH = 50
(CRT: 27/SRT: 23)
Cogpack Software
Drill-and-practice
COMT rs4680 Baseline/post-treatment differences in cognition between Val/Val and Met-carriers Greater improvement of executive functions and quality of life in Met carriers Met carriers
EF = 0.7
QoL = 0.50
57
Greenwood et al. (2011) SCH = 87 Cognitive Remediation Therapy
Strategy-based
COMT rs4680 Baseline/post-treatment differences in cognition between the three genotype groups (Met/Met, Val/Met, Val/Val) No effect of COMT genotype on CRT improvement No effect 77
Panizzutti et al. (2013) SCH = 48 Computerized cognitive training exercises
Drill and practice
COMT rs165599, rs9265, rs5993891, rs758373, rs2239395, rs2240713, rs739368, rs1544325 Association between variation in the COMT gene and global cognition improvement Cumulative effect of COMT SNPs on cognitive improvement N.A. 77
Mak et al. (2013) SCH = 41
HC = 40
RehaCom software
Drill and practice
COMT
BDNF
rs4680
rs6265
Baseline/post-treatment differences in cognition between Val/Val and Met-carriers No significant effects No effect 40
Bosia et al., 2014a, Bosia et al., 2014b SCH = 86 Cogpack Software
Drill-and-practice
COMT
5-HT1A-R
rs4680
rs6295
A general linear model analysis, with COMT and 5-HT1A-R genotypes as categorical predictors COMT Val/Val plus 5-HT1A G/G: lower improvement of EF. COMT Met Carriers plus 5-HT1A G/G group
EF = 0.9
48
Bosia et al., 2014a, Bosia et al., 2014b SCH = 98 Cogpack Software
Drill-and-practice
COMT rs4680 Baseline/post-treatment differences in cognition between Val/Val and Met-carriers Met carriers: greater improvement in processing speed in patients treated with D2 blockers Met Carriers
PS = 0.44
48
Burton et al. (2015) SCH = 41 Compensatory Cognitive Training
Strategy-based
COMT rs4680 COMT genotype as a predictor of response No effect of COMT genotype on cognitive improvement No effect 40
Lindenmayer et al. (2015) SCH = 145 Cogpack Software
Drill and practice
COMT rs4680 Baseline/post-treatment differences in cognition between the three genotype groups (Met/Met, Val/Met, Val/Val) Met carriers: greater improvements in multiple cognitive domains Met/Met
PS = 0.310
A/V = 0.021
WM = 0.028
VL = 0.183
VIL = 0.314
R-PS = 0.029
GCI = 0.024
56
Penadés et al. (2017) SCH = 70
(CRT: 35/SST: 35)
HC: 15
Cognitive Remediation Therapy
Strategy-based
BDNF rs6265 Differences in BDNF-serum levels between Val/Val and Met-carriers after CRT Val/Val: higher BDNF serum levels after cognitive treatment
Met-carriers: no changes
Week-4 = 0.54
After CRT = 0.64
70
Spangaro et al. (2018) SCH = 88 Cogpack Software
Drill-and-practice
SLC1A2 (EAAT2) rs4354668 Differences between T/T homozygote and carriers of the G allele T/T: greater Working Memory improvements after cognitive treatment
Interaction between genotype and therapy on EF outcome
T/T
WM = 0.69 (3 months); 0.64 (6 months)
T/T not treated with clozapine
EF = 0.68
49

CTAM: Clinical Trials Assessment Measure; SCH: Schizophrenia; HC: Healthy controls; CRT: Cognitive Remediation Therapy; SST: Social Skills Training; SRT: Standard Rehabilitation Treatment; COMT: Catechol-O-methyltransferase; BDNF: Brain derived neurotrophic factor, SLC1A2: Excitatory amino acid transporter 2; 5-HT1A-R: 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor. EATT2: Excitatory amino acid transporter 2; PS: Psychomotor Speed; A/V: Attention/vigilance; VL: Verbal Learning; VIL: Visual Learning; R-PS: Reasoning and Problem Solving; EF: Executive functions; GCI: Global Composite Index; QoL: Quality of Life.