Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 3.
Published in final edited form as: Pflugers Arch. 2017 Dec 27;470(4):599–611. doi: 10.1007/s00424-017-2099-3

Figure 5. Kir4.1 or Kir2.1•E224G channels maintain one stable level of resting membrane potential when co-expressed with HCN2 channels in CHO cells.

Figure 5.

(A-B) Resting membrane potentials (top) and whole-cell ramp currents (bottom) of CHO cells that express (A) rat Kir4.1 or (B) human Kir2.1•E224G mutant channels before and after [K+]e was changed from 5 mM to 2 mM. Kir4.1 reversal potentials shifted from −74.2 ± 1.0 mV to −97.4 ± 0.7 mV (n=5), whereas reversal potentials of Kir2.1•E224G channels shifted from −72.7 ± 1.0 mV to −95.8 ± 0.7 mV (n=6). (C-D) Resting membrane potentials (top) and whole-cell ramp currents (middle) of CHO cells that express (C) both Kir4.1 and HCN2 channels or (D) both Kir2.1•E224G and HCN2 channels before and after [K+]e was decreased from 5 mM to 2 mM. Time scale, 100 s. Middle row: Black and pink lines indicate whole-cell ramp currents in 5 and 2 mM [K+]e, respectively; purple and orange lines indicate the currents after sequential application of 0.5 mM Ba2+ and both 0.5 mM Ba2+ and 2 mM Cs+ in 2 mM [K+]e, respectively; inserts, Magnifications of ramp currents between −150 pA to 100 pA, illustrating clearly small HCN currents. Bottom row: Resting membrane potentials (filled bars) of the cells and reversal potentials (open bars) of whole-cell currents recorded in 5 and 2 mM [K+]e (n=4–17).