Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 13;10(39):9077–9083. doi: 10.1039/c9sc03088c

Fig. 4. Nanofiltration performances of the PA composite membranes. (a) Effects of different TpTGCl deposition densities on water permeance and Na2SO4 rejection. (b) Effects of different inorganic salt solutions on permeation flux and rejection. (c) Variation of permeation flux and Na2SO4 rejection under a permeating duration of 30 h. (d) Variation of permeation flux and Na2SO4 rejection at different applied pressures. (e) NF performance comparison between our membrane and other membranes reported in the literature.

Fig. 4