Skip to main content
. 2019 Winter;18(4):ar65. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-03-0069

TABLE 3.

Number of studies by data type and program

Data typea TRE n = 22 CURE n = 72 URE n = 65 Combination n = 9 Other n = 9 Total n = 177
Self-report only 6 (27%) 30 (42%) 35 (54%) 4 (44%) 1 (11%) 76 (43%)
More than self-report 16 (73%) 42 (58%) 30 (46%) 5 (56%) 8 (89%) 101 (57%)
Institutional/extrinsic 0 (0%) 14 (19%) 21 (32%) 2 (22%) 3 (33%) 41 (23%)
Quant. participantb 12 (55%) 42 (58%) 37 (57%) 5 (56%) 5 (56%) 101 (57%)
Qual. participantb 14 (64%) 40 (56%) 27 (42%) 6 (67%) 1 (11%) 88 (50%)
Quant. faculty/mentorb 0 (0%) 4 (6%) 3 (5%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%) 8 (5%)
Qual. faculty/mentorb 1 (5%) 2 (3%) 2 (3%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%) 6 (3%)
Interviewc 12 (55%) 8 (11%) 14 (22%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 35 (20%)
Content/practice 8 (36%) 27 (38%) 5 (8%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 42 (24%)
Other 8 (36%) 10 (14%) 6 (9%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 26 (15%)

aThe 177 data-driven papers were independently coded for self-report only vs. more than self-report, and type of data collected (survey, interviews, content/practice assessment, other). A paper could receive multiple codes for type of data collected.

bSelf-report survey, Quant, quantitative data (e.g., multiple choice, checkboxes) collected via survey; Qual, qualitative data (e.g., open-ended responses, essay questions) collected via survey.

cInterview includes focus groups.