Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 3.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2019 Apr 25;75(3):950–965. doi: 10.1111/biom.13060

TABLE 6.

Analysis of the IMPS study based on six candidate marginal mean regressions and three correlation structures

Predictors C(ρ) Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6
Time −1.339 (0.081)* −1.372 (0.084)* −1.166 (0.208)* −1.372 (0.084)* −1.180 (0.239)*
Drug −0.618 (0.182)* −0.854 (0.236)* −0.357 (0.438) −0.860 (0.237)* −0.524 (0.492)
Sex 0.116 (0.184) −0.188 (0.494)
Time × drug –0.256 (0.271) −0.252 (0.229)
Time × sex 0.023 (0.171)
Sex × drug 0.345 (0.460)
JEAIC AR1 27.55 398.50 16.08 17.55 17.64 22.63
EXC 94.52 491.44 90.70 91.87 94.14 101.78
IND 223.56 496.46 209.77 210.76 209.69 212.86
JEBIC AR1 39.42 410.37 31.91 37.33 37.42 54.28
EXC 106.38 503.31 106.53 111.65 113.92 133.43
IND 231.48 504.37 221.64 226.59 225.51 240.56
MLIC AR1 261.9 321.5 255.8 256 256.5 257.5
QICWr AR1 1,554.8 1,872.2 1,529.6 1,529.5 1,532.7 1,537.1

Summary results include WGEE estimates with standard errors in parentheses under an AR1 “working” correlation structure, and JEAIC, JEBIC, MLIC, and QICWr for model selection. It is noted that for MLIC and QICWr, an AR1 correlation structure is selected based on MLICC and QICWr, respectively.

Abbreviations: EXC, exchangeable; IMPS, institute of the mental health schizophrenia; IND, independence; JEAIC, joint empirical Akaike information criterion; JEBIC, joint empirical Bayesian information criterion; MLIC, missing longitudinal information criterion; QICW, weighted quasi-likelihood information criterion; WGEE, weighted generalized estimating equation.

*

p < 0.05.

The bold values denote the optimal models selected based on different criteria.