Table 4. GAS light values for each participant in baseline and active phase 4.
| GAS light values | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goal 1a |
Goal 2b |
Goal 3c |
T-score |
|||||
| BL | A4 | BL | A4 | BL | A4 | BL | A4 | |
| 003 | -1 | 2 | -1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | 36.3 | 68.3 |
| 005 | -1 | 2 | -1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | 36.3 | 68.3 |
| 009 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 36.3 | 36.3 |
| 010 | -1 | 2 | -1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | 36.3 | 72.8 |
| 011 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 36.3 | 63.7 |
BL, baseline; A4, active phase 4. Attainment for each goal was rated where: 0, expected level of achievement; +1, a little better than expected; +2, a lot better than expected; -1, no change; -2, worsening. T-score derived from Kiresuk & Sherman’s formula.[24]
a Goal 1, reduce number of temper outbursts for the participant
b Goal 2, improve the participants quality of life
c Goal 3, reduce the participants care demands.